Showing posts with label solubility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solubility. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Chapter 7.24 - Common Ion Effect and pH effect on Solubility

In the previous section, we saw solubility product constant. We saw some solved examples also. In this section we will see two more solved examples. After that, we will see common ion effect on solubility. We will also see the effect of pH on solubility

Solved example 7.92
Equal volumes of 0.002 M solutions of sodium iodate and cupric chlorate are mixed together. Will it lead to precipitation of copper iodate? (For cupric iodate Ksp = 7.4 × 10-8)
Solution:
1. Let V be the original volume of NaIO3 (sodium iodate)
• In 1 liter, there will be 0.002 moles of NaIO3
   ♦ So in V liters, there will be 0.002V moles of NaIO3
2. Cu(ClO3)2 (cupric chlorate) will be having the same volume V
• In 1 liter, there will be 0.002 moles of Cu(ClO3)2
   ♦ So in V liters, there will be 0.002V moles of Cu(ClO3)2
3. The two solutions are mixed together. So the volume of the final mixture will be 2V
• Then molarity of NaIO3 in the final mixture
= No. of molesVolume = 0.002V2V = 0.001
• Similarly, molarity of Cu(ClO3)2 in the final mixture
= No. of molesVolume = 0.002V2V = 0.001
4. Dissociation equations:
• NaIO3 will dissociate as: NaIO3 (s) ⇌ Na+ (aq) + IO3- (aq)
   ♦ NaIO3 will completely dissociate to give the following concentrations:
         ✰ [Na+] = 0.001
         ✰ [IO3-] = 0.001
• Cu(ClO3)2 will dissociate as: Cu(ClO3)2 (s) ⇌ Cu2+ (aq) + 2ClO3- (aq)
   ♦ Cu(IO3)2 will completely dissociate to give the following concentrations:
         ✰ [Cu2+] = 0.001
         ✰ [ClO3-] = (2 × 0.001) = 0.002
5. Cu2+ and IO3- will combine together to give Cu(IO3)2 (cupric iodate):
Cu2+ + 2IO3- ⇌ Cu(IO3)2
6. The solid Cu(IO3)2 thus formed will be in equilibrium with it's two ions:
Cu(IO3)2 (s) ⇌ Cu2+ (aq)+ 2IO3- (aq)
6. Q of this reaction is given by: Q = [Cu2+][IO3-]2 = (0.001)(0.001)2 = 10-9
◼  This Q is less than Ksp of Cu(IO3)2
7. So the system will try to increase Q
• That means, more and more Cu(IO3)2 will dissolve
• The precipitation of Cu(IO3)2 will not occur

Solved example 7.93
What is the maximum concentration of equimolar solutions of ferrous sulphate and sodium sulphide so that when mixed in equal volumes, there is no precipitation of iron sulphide? (For iron sulphide, Ksp = 6.3× 10-18)
Solution:
1. Let V be the original volume of FeSO4 (ferrous sulphate)
• Let x be the molarity of the solution
⇒ In 1 liter, there will be x moles of FeSO4
⇒ In V liters, there will ve Vx moles of FeSO4 
2. Let the same V be the original volume of Na2S (sodium sulfide)
• Let the molarity be the same x
⇒ In 1 liter, there will be x moles of Na2S
⇒ In V liters, there will ve Vx moles of Na2S
3. The two solutions are mixed together. So the volume of the final mixture will be 2V
• Then molarity of FeSO4 in the final mixture
= No. of molesVolume = Vx2V = 0.5x
• Similarly, molarity of Na2S in the final mixture
= No. of molesVolume = Vx2V = 0.5x
4. Dissociation equations:
• FeSO4 will dissociate as: FeSO4 (s) ⇌ Fe2+ (aq) + SO42- (aq)
   ♦ FeSO4 will completely dissociate to give the following concentrations:
         ✰ [Fe2+] = 0.5x
         ✰ [SO42-] = 0.5x
• Na2S will dissociate as: Na2S (s) ⇌ 2Na+ + S2-
   ♦ Cu(IO3)2 will completely dissociate to give the following concentrations:
         ✰ [Na+] = (2 × 0.5x) = x
         ✰ [S2-] = 0.5x
5. Fe2+ and S2- will combine together to give FeS (iron sulphide):
Fe2+ + S2- ⇌ FeS
6. The solid FeS thus formed will be in equilibrium with it's two ions:
FeS (s) ⇌ Fe2+ (aq) + S2- (aq)
6. Q of this reaction is given by: Q = [Fe2+][S2-] = (0.5x)(0.5x) = 0.25x2
◼  This Q must be less than or equal to Ksp
If it is greater than Ksp, precipitation willtake place
7. To find the maximum aloowable value, we will equate the two:
Q = Ksp
⇒ 0.25x2 = 6.3 × 10-18
⇒ x = 5.02 × 10-9

Solved example 7.94
The concentration of sulphide ion in 0.1M HCl solution saturated with hydrogen
sulphide is 1.0 × 10-19 M. If 10 mL of this is added to 5 mL of 0.04 M solution of
the following: FeSO4, MnCl2, ZnCl2 and CdCl2. In which of these solutions
precipitation will take place?
Solution:
1. Finding the concentration of S2- (sulphide ions):
(i) The original concentration of S2- is 1.0 × 10-19 M
⇒ 1 liter will contain 1.0 × 10-19 moles of S2-
⇒ 1 mL will contain (1.0 × 10-19 ÷ 1000) = 1.0 × 10-22 moles of S2-
⇒ 10 mL will contain (1.0 × 10-22 × 10) = 1.0 × 10-21 moles of S2- ions
(ii) This 10 mL is added to 5 mL each of matallic solutions
⇒ The final volumes of each metallic solution is (10 + 5) = 15 mL
⇒ 1.0 × 10-21 moles of S2- is present in 15 mL of solution
⇒ No. of moles of S2- in 1 mL = (1.0 × 10-21 ÷ 15) = 6.67 × 10-23
⇒ Concentration of S2-
= No. of moles in 1 liter = (6.67 × 10-23 × 1000) = 6.67 × 10-20 moles
⇒ Concentration of S2- in the 15 mL solution = [S2-] = 6.67 × 10-20 M
2. FeSO4 will completely dissociate in aqueous solution
• So 0.04 M FeSO4 will give 0.04 M Fe2+ ions
• Let us find the concentration of Fe2+:
(i) The original concentration of Fe2+ is 0.04 M
⇒ 1 liter will contain 0.04 moles of Fe2+
⇒ 1 mL will contain (0.04 ÷ 1000) = 4.0 × 10-5 moles of Fe2+
⇒ 5 mL will contain (4.0 × 10-5 × 5) = 20.0 × 10-5 moles of Fe2+ ions
(ii) This 5 mL is added to 10 mL of sulphide solutions
⇒ The final volumes of each metallic solution is (10 + 5) = 15 mL
⇒ 20.0 × 10-5 moles of Fe2+ is present in 15 mL of solution
⇒ No. of moles of Fe2+ in 1 mL = (20.0 × 10-5 ÷ 15) = 1.33 × 10-5
⇒ Concentration of Fe2+ = No. of moles in 1 liter
= (1.33 × 10-5 × 1000) = 1.33 × 10-2 moles
⇒ Concentration of Fe2+ in the 15 mL solution = [Fe2+] = 1.33 × 10-2 M
3. In a similar way, MnCl2, ZnCl2 and CdCl2 will also completely dissociate into ions. So we get:
[Mn2+] = [Zn2+] = [Cd2+] = 1.33 × 10-2 M
4. Consider the solution of FeSO4
• The Fe2+ will combine with S2- to form FeS
• The Q of this reaction = [Fe2+][S2-] = (1.33 × 10-2 × 6.67 × 10-20) = 8.87 × 10-22
◼ From the data book, we have: Ksp of FeS = 6.3 × 10-18
    ♦ So Q has to increse. That means, the concentration of ions must increase
    ♦ So more and more FeS will dissolve. It will not precipitate
5. Consider the solution of MnCl2
• The Mn2+ will combine with S2- to form MnS
• The Q of this reaction = [Mn2+][S2-] = (1.33 × 10-2 × 6.67 × 10-20) = 8.87 × 10-22
◼ From the data book, we have: Ksp of MnS = 2.5 × 10-13
    ♦ So Q has to increse. That means, the concentration of ions must increase
    ♦ So more and more MnS will dissolve. It will not precipitate
6. Consider the solution of ZnCl2
• The Zn2+ will combine with S2- to form ZnS
• The Q of this reaction = [Zn2+][S2-] = (1.33 × 10-2 × 6.67 × 10-20) = 8.87 × 10-22
◼ From the data book, we have: Ksp of ZnS = 1.6 × 10-24
    ♦ So Q has to decrease. That means, the concentration of ions must decrease
    ♦ So more and more solid ZnS has to form. It will precipitate
7. Consider the solution of CdCl2
• The Cd2+ will combine with S2- to form CdS
• The Q of this reaction = [Cd2+][S2-] = (1.33 × 10-2 × 6.67 × 10-20) = 8.87 × 10-22
◼ From the data book, we have: Ksp of CdS = 8.0 × 10-27
    ♦ So Q has to decrease. That means, the concentration of ions must decrease
    ♦ So more and more solid CdS has to form. It will precipitate


Common ion effect on solubility

Some basics can be written in 3 steps:
1. Consider the general form of an ionic equilibrium:
Mxp+Xyq- Mxp+ + Xyq-
   ♦ On the left side of the equation, we have the salt
   ♦ On the right side of the equation, we have the ions
• The solid salt will be in equilibrium with the ions
2. If we increase the concentration of one of the ions, the equilibrium is disturbed
• Then according to Le Chatelier’s principle,the system will try to decrease the effect of those extra ions
• For that, some of the extra ions will combine with the opposite ions to give the salt
• This leads to precipitation of the salt
3. If we decrease the concentration of one of the ions, then also, equilibrium is disturbed
• Then according to Le Chatelier’s principle,the system will try to decrease the effect of those depleted ions
• For that, some of the solid will dissociate into the solution
• This leads to a decrease in the quantity of solids in the solution


Let us see an example. It can be written in 7 steps:
1. A vessel contains Ag+ (silver ions) in a solution
• We want to know how much silver ions are present in that solution
2. For that, take about 10 mL of that solution
• To that 10 mL, add enough Cl- ions
3. The equilibrium is disturbed due to the excess Cl- ions
• In order to reduce the effect of excess Cl- ions, they combine with Ag+ ions to form AgCl
• The reaction is: Ag+ + Cl- ⇌ AgCl
    ♦ AgCl is insoluble in water. It will precipitate
4. If there is enough Cl- ions, all the Ag+ in that 10 mL will precipitate as solid AgCl
• Solid AgCl is sparingly soluble in water. So it can be easily separated form the solution
5. The mass of that solid AgCl is measured
◼ From that mass, we get an important information:
The quantity of Ag+ ions in the 10 mL solution
6. If quantity in the 10 mL solution is known, we can easily calculate:
The quantity of Ag+ ions in the original solution
◼ This method of finding the quantity of a substance is called gravimetric estimation
7. Let us see two more examples:
• We can calculate the quantity of ferric ions
    ♦ For that, ferric ions are made to precipitate as ferric hydroxide
    ♦ Ferric hydroxide is sparingly soluble in water
• The quantity of barium ions
    ♦ For that, barium ions are made to precipitate as barium sulphate
    ♦ Barium sulphate is sparingly soluble in water

Solved example 7.95
Calculate the molar solubility of Ni(OH)2 in 0.10 M NaOH. The ionic product of
Ni(OH)2 is 2.0 × 10-15
Solution:
1. The dissolution of Ni(OH)2 will be according to the equation:
Ni(OH)2 (s) ⇌ Nip+ (aq) + 2OHq- (aq)
• The superscripts p+ and q- are given only to indicate that they are ions. Those charges do not have any effect on S
2. When one mole of Ni(OH)2 dissolve in water,
   ♦ 1 mole of Nip+ is produced
   ♦ 2 moles of OHq- are produced
3. So when S moles of Ni(OH)2 dissolve in water,
   ♦ S moles of Nip+ are produced
   ♦ 2S moles of OHq- are produced
4. But in our present case, 0.10 moles of OHq- is already present
    ♦ This extra OHq- ions is due to the dissociation of 0.10 M NaOH
• Then we can write:
Ksp = [Nip+]1[OHq-]2 = (S)1(2S+0.10)2
• Here, 2S will be very small (when compared to 0.10) because, the solubility of Ni(OH)2 is very small
    ♦ So we can approximate (2S+0.10) as 0.10
5. So we can write:
Ksp = [Nip+]1[OHq-]2 = (S)1(2S+0.10)2 = (S)1(0.10)2
⇒ 2.0 × 10-15 = 0.01 × S1
⇒ S = 2.0 × 10-13


Effect of pH on solubility

This can be explained with the help of an example. It can be written in 11 steps:
1. Consider the sparingly soluble salt CaCO3
• It’s dissociation can be written as:
CaCO3 (s) ⇌ Ca2+ (aq) + CO32- (aq)
2. CO32- attracts one proton from the water molecule to become HCO3-
    ♦ When the water molecule loses one proton, it becomes OH-
3. So there are two reactions taking place:
    ♦ CaCO3 (s) ⇌ Ca2+ + CO32-
    ♦ CO32- + H2O ⇌ HCO3- + OH-
4. The net reaction can be obtained by adding the two. We get:
CaCO3 (s) + H2O ⇌ Ca2+ + HCO3- + OH-
5. The presence of OH- ions, make the solution basic
    ♦ So it’s pH will be greater than 7
6. If we add more OH- ions, the system will try to reduce the effect by favoring the backward reaction
• So more and more solid CaCO3 will be produced
• In effect, the CaCO3 will become more and more insoluble
7. Remember that:
When we add more OH- ions, we are increasing the pH
◼ So we can write:
When we increase the pH, CaCO3 which is originally sparingly soluble becomes even more insoluble
8. If in step (6), instead of OH- ions, we add H3O+ ions, those extra H3O+ ions will react with OH- ions to form water
• The reaction is: H3O+ + OH- ⇌ 2H2O
9. Thus the OH- ions are removed
• The system will try to reduce the effect of this OH- depletion by favoring the forward reaction
• So more and more solid CaCO3 dissolves
10. Remember that:
When we add more H3O+ ions, we are decreasing the pH
◼ So we can write:
When we decrease the pH, CaCO3 which is originally sparingly soluble, becomes more soluble
11. This is the reason for the damages suffered by limestone (CaCO3) statues due to acid rains


• In the next chapter, we will see redox reactions


Previous

Contents

Next

Copyright©2021 Higher secondary chemistry.blogspot.com

Saturday, February 27, 2021

Chapter 6.11 - Solution Process - Exothermic or Endothermic

In the previous section, we saw details about enthalpy of solution
• We saw that
    ♦ ΔHsol of NaCl is positive
    ♦ ΔHsol of CaCl2 is negative
• In this section, we will see the reason for why some values are positive, while some are negative

• First we will see a side by side comparison between NaCl and LiCl
• The comparison can be written in 7 steps:
1. Drawing the cycles side by side
    ♦ Fig.6.17(a) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for NaCl
    ♦ Fig.6.17(b) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for LiCl

Fig.6.17

2. Comparing lattice enthalpies
    ♦ In fig.a, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of LiCl
• We see that, in fig.b, the yellow arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHlattice of NaCl is 788
        ✰ ΔHlattice of LiCl is 829
3. Comparing hydration enthalpy of Cl-
• In the previous section , we drew:
    ♦ ΔHhyd of the positive ion on top
    ♦ ΔHlattice of negative ion at bottom
• This time, since we have to make a comparison, we will draw the negative ion (Cl-) on top
    ♦ In fig.a, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Cl- ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Cl- ion in LiCl
• The green dashed line indicates that, both the pink arrows are of the same size
4. Comparing hydration enthalpies of Na+ and Li+
    ♦ In fig.a, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Na+ ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Li+ ion in LiCl
• We see that, in fig.b, the bottom pink arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHhyd of Na+ is -424
        ✰ ΔHhyd of Li+ is -538
5. The competing items:
• There is always a competition between the following two items:
(i) The yellow arrow
(ii) Sum of the two pink arrows
• This can be explained in two steps:
(i) The yellow arrow indicates the amount of energy that is to be supplied to dissociate the salt into it's ions in gaseous state
• So we can write:
    ♦ Longer yellow indicates that, we need to supply greater energy
    ♦ Shorter yellow indicates that, we need to supply only lesser energy
(ii) The pink arrows indicate the amount of energy that will be released during hydration processes
• So we can write:
   ♦ Longer pink arrow indicates that, we will receive greater energy
   ♦ Shorter pink arrow indicates that, we will receive only a lesser energy
(iii) So the net energy supplied/received will depend on the relative sizes of arrows
6. In NaCl, we see that, the yellow arrow is longer than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we need to supply a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus positive
7. In LiCl, we see that, the yellow arrow is shorter than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we will receive a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus negative


The reason for such a difference can be written in 8 steps:

1. In the periodic table, both Li and Na belongs to group I
2. But Li is above Na
• So Li will have a lesser number of main shells
• Indeed we know that:
    ♦ Li has two main shells: K and L
    ♦ Na has three main shells: K, L and M
3. So the ionic radius of Li+ will be smaller than the ionic radius of Na+
(We saw those details when we learnt about periodic trends. Details here)
• When the ionic radius decreases, the attractive force on the opposite ion increases
    ♦ Then it will be more difficult to separate the two ions
4. In our present case, this increased attraction has the following two effects:
(i) In the lattice structures:
    ♦ Li+ exerts a greater attraction on Cl-
    ♦ Na+ exerts a lesser attraction on Cl-
• So more energy is required for dissociation in the case of LiCl
(ii) In the hydrated structures:
    ♦ Li+ exerts a greater attraction on H2O molecules
    ♦ Na+ exerts a lesser attraction on H2O molecules
• So more energy will be released during hydration of Li+
5. As a result of 4(i):
    ♦ the yellow arrow of LiCl is longer
    ♦ the yellow arrow of NaCl is shorter
6. As a result of 4(ii):
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of LiCl is longer
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of NaCl is shorter
7. How ΔHsol of LiCl becomes negative:
• We see that (when compared to NaCl), both yellow and bottom pink arrow of LiCl become longer
• We would expect the effects to cancel each other
    ♦ But the increase in the bottom pink arrow
    ♦ is much larger than
    ♦ the increase in yellow arrow
• So the 'increase in pink arrow' outweighs the 'increase in yellow arrow'
    ♦ Thus we receive a net energy
    ♦ In other words, ΔHsol of LiCl is negative
8. Thus we see that, the ionic radius plays an important role in determining the sign of ΔHsol 


In addition to the 'ionic radius', the 'ionic charge' also plays an important role. This can be explained by comparing NaCl and CaCl2. It can be written in steps:

1. Drawing the cycles side by side
    ♦ Fig.6.18(a) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for NaCl
    ♦ Fig.6.18(b) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for CaCl2

Fig.6.18


2. Comparing lattice enthalpies
    ♦ In fig.a, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of CaCl2
• We see that, in fig.b, the yellow arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHlattice of NaCl is 788
        ✰ ΔHlattice of LiCl is 2258
3. Comparing hydration enthalpies of Cl-
    ♦ In fig.a, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Cl- ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Cl- ion in CaCl2
• We see that, in fig.b, the top pink arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ In CaCl2, two moles of Cl- ions are available
        ✰ Naturally, greater energy will be released during hydration of Cl-
4. Comparing hydration enthalpies of Na+ and Ca2+:
    ♦ In fig.a, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Na+ ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Ca+ ion in CaCl2
• We see that, in fig.b, the bottom pink arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHhyd of Na+ is -424
        ✰ ΔHhyd of Ca2+ is -1650
5. The competing items:
• There is always a competition between the following two items:
(i) The yellow arrow
(ii) Sum of the two pink arrows
• This can be explained in two steps:
(i) The yellow arrow indicates the amount of energy that is to be supplied to dissociate the salt into it's ions in gaseous state
• So we can write:
    ♦ Longer yellow indicates that, we need to supply greater energy
    ♦ Shorter yellow indicates that, we need to supply only lesser energy
(ii) The pink arrows indicate the amount of energy that will be released during hydration processes
• So we can write:
   ♦ Longer pink arrow indicates that, we will receive greater energy
   ♦ Shorter pink arrow indicates that, we will receive only a lesser energy
(iii) So the net energy supplied/received will depend on the relative sizes of arrows
6. In NaCl, we see that, the yellow arrow is longer than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we need to supply a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus positive
7. In CaCl2, we see that, the yellow arrow is shorter than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we will receive a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus negative


The reason for such a difference can be written in 8 steps:

1. Comparison of charges:
    ♦ In Na+, the charge is +1
    ♦ In Ca2+, the charge is +2
• So Ca2+ has a greater charge
• When the ionic charge increases, the attractive force on the opposite ion increases
    ♦ Then it will be more difficult to separate the two ions
2. In our present case, this increased attraction has the following two effects:
(i) In the lattice structures:
    ♦ Ca2+ exerts a greater attraction on Cl-
    ♦ Na+ exerts a lesser attraction on Cl-
• So more energy is required for dissociation in the case of CaCl2
(ii) In the hydrated structures:
    ♦ Ca2+ exerts a greater attraction on H2O molecules
    ♦ Na+ exerts a lesser attraction on H2O molecules
• So more energy will be released during hydration of Ca2+
3. As a result of 2(i):
    ♦ the yellow arrow of CaCl2 is longer
    ♦ the yellow arrow of NaCl is shorter
4. As a result of 2(ii):
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of CaCl2 is longer
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of NaCl is shorter
7. How ΔHsol of CaCl2 becomes negative:
• We see that (when compared to NaCl), both yellow and pink arrows of CaCl2 become longer
• We would expect the effects to cancel each other
    ♦ But the increase in the pink arrows
    ♦ is much larger than
    ♦ the increase in yellow arrow
• So the 'increase in pink arrow' outweighs the 'increase in yellow arrow'
    ♦ Thus we receive a net energy
    ♦ In other words, ΔHsol of CaCl2 is negative
8. Thus we see that, the 'ionic charge' also plays an important role in determining the sign of ΔHsol 


• In the above discussions we compared compounds having the same negative ion but different positive ions:
   ♦ NaCl and LiCl
   ♦ NaCl and CaCl2
• Next we will compare two compounds having the same positive ion but different negative ions:
   ♦ NaCl and NaF 

• First we will see a side by side comparison between NaCl and NaF
• The comparison can be written in 7 steps:
1. Drawing the cycles side by side
    ♦ Fig.6.19(a) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for NaCl
    ♦ Fig.6.19(b) below shows the Born-Haber cycle for NaF

Fig.6.19

 2. Comparing lattice enthalpies
    ♦ In fig.a, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the yellow arrow shows the ΔHlattice of NaF
• We see that, in fig.b, the yellow arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHlattice of NaCl is 788
        ✰ ΔHlattice of NaF is 904
3. Comparing hydration enthalpy of Na+
• Since we have to make a comparison, we will draw the positive ion (Na+) on top
    ♦ In fig.a, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Na+ ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the top pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Na+ ion in NaF
• The green dashed line indicates that, both the pink arrows are of the same size
4. Comparing hydration enthalpies of Cl- and F-:
    ♦ In fig.a, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of Cl- ion in NaCl
    ♦ In fig.b, the bottom pink arrow shows the ΔHhyd of F- ion in NaF
• We see that, in fig.b, the bottom pink arrow is longer
    ♦ This is because
        ✰ ΔHhyd of Cl- is -359
        ✰ ΔHhyd of F- is -504
5. The competing items:
There is always a competition between the following two items:
(i) The yellow arrow
(ii) Sum of the two pink arrows
• This can be explained in two steps:
(i) The yellow arrow indicates the amount of energy that is to be supplied to dissociate the salt into it's ions in gaseous state
• So we can write:
    ♦ Longer yellow indicates that, we need to supply greater energy
    ♦ Shorter yellow indicates that, we need to supply only lesser energy
(ii) The pink arrows indicate the amount of energy that will be released during hydration processes
• So we can write:
   ♦ Longer pink arrow indicates that, we will receive greater energy
   ♦ Shorter pink arrow indicates that, we will receive only a lesser energy
(iii) So the net energy supplied/received will depend on the relative sizes of arrows
6. In NaCl, we see that, the yellow arrow is longer than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we need to supply a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus positive
7. In NaF, we see that, the yellow arrow is shorter than the sum of two pink arrows
   ♦ So we will receive a net energy
   ♦ The ΔHsol is thus negative


The reason for such a difference can be written in 8 steps:

1. In the periodic table, both Cl and F belong to group 17
2. But F is above Cl
• So F will have a lesser number of main shells
• Indeed we know that:
    ♦ F has two main shells: K and L
    ♦ Cl has three main shells: K, L and M
3. So the ionic radius of F- will be smaller than the ionic radius of Cl-
(We saw those details when we learnt about periodic trends. Details here)
• When the ionic radius decreases, the attractive force on the opposite ion increases
    ♦ Then it will be more difficult to separate the two ions
4. In our present case, this increased attraction has the following two effects:
(i) In the lattice structures:
    ♦ F- exerts a greater attraction on Na+
    ♦ Cl- exerts a lesser attraction on Na+
• So more energy is required for dissociation in the case of NaF
(ii) In the hydrated structures:
    ♦ F- exerts a greater attraction on H2O molecules
    ♦ Cl- exerts a lesser attraction on H2O molecules
• So more energy will be released during hydration of F-
5. As a result of 4(i):
    ♦ the yellow arrow of NaF is longer
    ♦ the yellow arrow of NaCl is shorter
6. As a result of 4(ii):
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of NaF is longer
    ♦ the bottom pink arrow of NaCl is shorter
7. How ΔHsol of NaF becomes negative:
• We see that (when compared to NaCl), both yellow and bottom pink arrow of NaF become longer
• We would expect the effects to cancel each other
    ♦ But the increase in the bottom pink arrow
    ♦ is much larger than
    ♦ the increase in yellow arrow
• So the 'increase in pink arrow' outweighs the 'increase in yellow arrow'
    ♦ Thus we receive a net energy
    ♦ In other words, ΔHsol of NaF is negative
8. Thus we see that, the 'ionic radius' of 'negative ions' also play an important role in determining the sign of ΔHsol 


Solubility of salts

• We have seen that, the ionic radius plays an important role in determining the lattice enthalpy
    ♦ Smaller the ionic radius, greater will be the bond between the ions
• So in the lattice structure, bonds in the fluorides will be stronger than bonds in the chlorides
    ♦ That is why it is more difficult to dissolve fluorides when compared to chlorides


General formula for enthalpy of solution

A general formula can be derived in 5 steps:
1. We saw that, there is always a competition between the following two items:
(i) The yellow arrow
(ii) Sum of the two pink arrows
2. Mathematical form:
    ♦ The yellow arrow is ΔHlattice
    ♦ Sum of two pink arrows is: ∑ ΔHhyd
3. Result of the competition:
    ♦ The yellow arrow is in the upward direction
    ♦ Pink arrows are in the downward direction
• So result will be given by subtraction: ΔHlattice - ∑ ΔHhyd
4. This result is the enthalpy of solution. So we can write:
Eq.6.12: ΔHsol = ΔHlattice - ∑ ΔHhyd
5. This Eq.6.12 can be used for both exothermic and endothermic processes
• Consider the two terms on the right side of the equation
    ♦ If the first term is larger, we will get a positive result
        ✰ This indicates an endothermic process
    ♦ If the first term is smaller, we will get a negative result
        ✰ This indicates an exothermic process


• In the next section, we will see spontaneity

Previous

Contents

Next

Copyright©2021 Higher secondary chemistry.blogspot.com